Both comments were caught by advisers off security that doesn’t show up anywhere in his scripted remarks and going far beyond official government position. His remark about the genocide took place in an ethanol refinery. in Iowa, standing on a covered stage in straw.
“We will let lawyers decide at the international level whether this is appropriate,” he said. on asphalt of Des Moines International Airport as it prepared for board Air Force One”, but this sure It seems that way to me.”
Dynamics sometimes created tension for president, whose reaction to the conflict was times deeply emotional and whose decades of experience in international relationships at the lower levels of senator and vice president – inform his thinking.
His comment about the genocide has raised concerns among some officials that it is moving forward of litigation by the administration, and this can be regarded as exerting pressure on officials currently working on creating official definition according to people familiar with answer. Just a week before he spoke, Biden national security official said there were no conditions met to call this is genocide, and the State Department has not yet said whether it has found evidence of a change in this position.
When viewing scenes of atrocities that appeared over in past week Biden privately suggested that they could be proof of genocide, according to a person familiar with cause. But it wasn’t made official his administration when he called it genocide in public.
It was latest example of Biden’s longtime political traits of direct conversation and empathy are tested in its new sublime role. His allies and advisers say these characteristics serve as clarifying force for basically a single western alliance. And Biden said privately that there is little time to waste. in call out Putin’s actions for what they are clearly.
But some question his impulses and wonder if more a disciplined approach work it is better.
After he said in Iowa became clearer and clearer that genocide was in full swing in Ukraine and French President Emmanuel Macron expressed concern about the escalation language may hinder attempts to negotiate a settlement to the violence.
“I want keep trying as best I can to stop this war and rebuild world. not me sure that escalation of rhetoric serves this cause” Macron said. He also warned against escalation after Biden comment in Warsaw that Putin should to be no more in power.
Another world leaders welcomed Biden’s outspokenness. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he believes it is “absolutely right that more and more people”are using the word “genocide” to describe Russian attacks in Ukraine. However, the Canadian leader stopped of accusing the Kremlin of committing genocide.
Biden gets out in front of rest of his administration
“There are certain legal obligations with official definition of genocide”, Victoria Nuland, under secretary of state for political affairs said on CNN the day after Biden’s speech.
Nevertheless, the White House tried not to downplay the words, because just reflections of a private citizen.
“He is the president and we are here to put his vision into practice,” the press said. secretary Jen Psaki said. “I think we shouldn’t misunderstand who he and where he is on the totem pole at the top.”
Ultimately, Biden comment about the genocide is not expected to cause any immediate changes us policy towards Ukraine, leading Some wonder what’s the use of saying what it was.
“The biggest question for me is what purpose does it serve? We can have a philosophical, legal debate about whether what the Russians have done to date is technically genocide. of activities that fall under the category of military crime. But then the question is, why talk about it in that way? Does it make it easier put an end to the war?” said Richard Haas, President of advice on foreign relations.
“I’ll be honest with you, I don’t see the usefulness of do it and don’t get me wrong, that’s not what the Russians do,” Haas said. on. “It’s not that these aren’t terrible things. Now my question is: how whether it serves as a strategic policy goals? And I’ll be honest with you, I don’t see how it does.”
In the end, Biden’s remark was justified in Same place how his determination Putin cannot remain in power: Destructive emotions of conflict that erupted out in hard- watch images of atrocities and suffering. Biden himself lamented that, as president of his ability be a witness to suffering in Ukraine is limited by burdensome but necessary paraphernalia of Job.
“We do not send the president to Ukraine”
When planning your visit to poland last month, Biden team explored the possibility of intersection over border to visit Ukraine, which will send an important signal of support. President Volodymyr Zelensky urged Biden to visit Kyiv over and over in telephone call before invasion and continued to publicly call on Western leaders to make the trip.
White House officials discuss the prospect of Biden, slipping into Ukraine, has weighed in on the US influence it would take for such a visit, including military and secret service assets along with retinue of assistants and the press — as well as what Ukrainian resources required.
“They won’t let me, of course, I think, cross the border and see what’s going on. on in Ukraine,” he said.
As a senator and vice president, Biden was regular visitor to American war zones, including on secret dark-of- night trips – fact he mentioned when he met the troops at the stadium in poland.
“I was in and out of Iraq and Afghanistan about 40 times’, he recalled.
But unlike stopping in Iraq or Afghanistan, where US bases and personnel could help secure airspace, Ukraine is not an American war zone, and Biden has steadfastly refused to send American troops into the country itself.
With the withdrawal of Russian troops from area around Ukraine stream of Western leaders have infiltrated the country. The first was European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who stopped to view scenes of atrocities in city of Bucha before leaving for Kyiv.
Watching from Washington, Biden could not help but I want to go myself. Since taking office, he has long argued that leaders’ meetings face-to-face much better than talking on phone, and last months last-minute NATO summit in Brussels was his idea. As a politician, his strength has always been in human interactions with normal people.
But even logistics of the visit of the British leader, which included planes, trains and helicopters, prove impossible for American leader.
After returning from Europe, Biden used his public appearances to focus solely on on domestic issues, scaling up his travels around the country to advertise the economic progress as his approval ratings continue to fall. The assistants say the problems with the kitchen table are a priority and his schedule reflects this.
Biden said this week he is still deciding whether to send senior- US level official to Ukraine. When he jokingly asked a reporter if they were ready to go, they fired back: “You?”
“Yes,” Biden said.
“He’s ready, he’s ready for anything. Man loves fast cars, several aviators, he is ready to go to Ukraine,” the message reads. secretary Jen Psaki said on Thursday in interview with “Under Save America”.
Still, she was clear there was no prospect of such a trip materializes: “We are not sending the president to Ukraine,” she said.
.
Source: Biden’s trademark political traits are war-tested in Ukraine
